Scientific publication: How to handle rejection?
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...
متن کاملتولیدات علمی در رشتههای پرستاری و مامایی
Production of knowledge in nursing and midwifery is essential to develop body of knowledge and improve quality of health care. In recent years, growth rate of scientific publication in Iran was significant as it could be considered as a scientific jihad. Although everyone is proud of this accomplishment, an important question remaining in nursing and midwifery is that how the pace of scientific...
متن کاملConstraint Propagation for LinearRecursive
There are many ways in which the query answering process for deductive databases may be optimised. Many of these methods rely on applying constraints as soon as possible, to avoid the production and later rejection of facts which are not relevant to the query. This propagation of constraints is much simpler for left-linear programs than for many others. In this paper we show how to transform ri...
متن کاملمطالعه وضعیت نشر مجلات علمی در ایران
Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the publication status of Iranian scientific journals with regard to scope, organizational affiliation, scientific level, publication language, electronic publication, and full-text access, either free or paid. Methodology: The evaluative research method has been used in this study. A checklist was employed for collection of data related to scop...
متن کاملMisconduct in Research and Publication
Dear Editor, I read the recent publication on “Misconduct in Research and Publication” with great interest[1]. I agree that misconduct in research and publication is not uncommon. Nevertheless, it is rarely mentioned. In fact, there are many incorrect conceptions among researchers on publication ethics. The milder examples are attempts to report only the “positive outcomes&rdq...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archivos argentinos de pediatria
دوره 113 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015